Previous Page  29 / 194 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 29 / 194 Next Page
Page Background

29

www.MountPleasantMagazine.com

|

www.BestOfMountPleasant.com

|

www.ILoveMountPleasant.com

Mount Pleasant’s borrowing costs.

“There’s no way they can improve on what we’ve done,”

said Glasson. “Show us an area where we can improve.

They’ll undo a lot of what we did. In time, they’ll realize

the things we did helped the town.”

O’Neal, who served on the Council for four years and

earned a spot in the runoff before finishing third to Owens

and Haney, said he was disappointed but not upset about

his loss.

“I don’t know anything I could have done,” he

remarked. “Elections are interesting things, and this one

had interesting results. I don’t think anyone can say I didn’t

do a good job.”

Though the construction of an office building/parking

garage at Mill

Street and Coleman

Boulevard provided

the impetus for the

creation of Save

Shem Creek, for all

practical purposes,

the election was

framed as a battle

about growth: a

fight among those

who wanted to use

the gas pedal and

those who favored

the brakes. That, at

least, was the word

Mount Pleasant’s voters seemed to hear, though neither

side would admit to intentionally sending that message.

“The board members of Save Shem Creek are not

against growth,” Bagwell insisted. “It’s a myth that we are

opposed to growth. We want sensible growth.”

“We needed to go forward with a sense of responsible

growth, not urgent growth,” said Owens, a founding

member of Save Shem Creek. He resigned from the board

of the organization before taking the Council oath of office.

“The issue was growth and all that accompanies

growth,” Haney pointed out. “But we’ll go with what is

prudent. We’re not talking about drastic measures.”

Neither Glasson, O’Neal nor Nickels ruled out the

possibility of returning to the political arena sometime in

the future.

“I enjoy it. People have asked me why I run for office.

What keeps me going is that the little guy needs help,”

Glasson said.

“The race has to be right and the time has to be right,”

O’Neal said. “I don’t see the results of this election as an

indictment of the job I did.”

Nickels also was optimistic about his political future.

“I feel like I have

something to offer,” he

said. “I feel like there

will be opportunities

in the future, and,

if an opportunity

presents itself, I’ll take

a long, hard look at it.

For now, I am going

to support my new

Council. I’m going

to pay attention to

what they’re doing. I’ll

be a cheerleader for

the town of Mount

Pleasant.”

And, taking one more stab at explaining why Mount

Pleasant’s voters sent three incumbents packing, he

commented: “When you look back on this election, you’ll

see that 6,000 people were really motivated by believing,

legitimately or not, that their town government was

allowing unfettered growth. The Save Shem Creek political

movement did a great job of collecting information and

putting together a slate of candidates.”

“I enjoy it. People have asked me why I

run for office. What keeps me going is

that the little guy needs help.”

- Former Councilman Ken Glasson

“I don’t know anything I could have done.

Elections are interesting things, and this

one had interesting results.”

- Former Councilman Chris O’Neal

Chris Nickels

Chris O’Neal